skip to main content

Abdication, Collective Alignment, and the Problem of Directionality

Hall, John R

Social science history, 2010-04, Vol.34 (1), p.91-96 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Abdication, Collective Alignment, and the Problem of Directionality
  • Autor: Hall, John R
  • Assuntos: Abdication ; Choices ; Collectives ; Epistemology ; France ; Germany ; Group Decision Making ; Personal power ; Political actors ; Rational choice ; Review articles
  • É parte de: Social science history, 2010-04, Vol.34 (1), p.91-96
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
    ObjectType-Article-2
    ObjectType-Feature-1
  • Descrição: A central issue for understanding the outcomes of highly challenging situations is the emergence and resolution of collective stances. Ivan Ermakoff's book Ruling Oneself Out: A Theory of Collective Abdications (2008) explores this issue by considering processes of collective abdication and decision making in two highly contested and revealing cases: the decisions to abdicate constitutional power in Germany (1933) and in France (1940). In this critical exchange Howard Kimeldorf, Ari Adut, and John R. Hall address the main claims of Ruling Oneself Out as well as the theoretical and epistemological challenges raised by these claims. Three broad questions emerge from this discussion. The first concerns the explanatory relevance of motives such as fear, misjudgment, and collusion, to which in retrospect we are prone to impute such dramatic and momentous decisions. The second centers on the possible connections between the theory of collective alignment and contemporary work on organizations. The third engages the open-ended character of the processes at play and the issue of analytic generalization. Adapted from the source document.
  • Idioma: Inglês

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.