skip to main content
Idioma:
Primo Search
Clear Search Box
Search in: Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices

Incentivizing self-regulation: Federal vs. state-level voluntary programs in US climate change policies

Hsueh, Lily ; Prakash, Aseem

Regulation & governance, 2012-12, Vol.6 (4), p.445-473 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Incentivizing self-regulation: Federal vs. state-level voluntary programs in US climate change policies
  • Autor: Hsueh, Lily ; Prakash, Aseem
  • Assuntos: Benefits ; Capital ; Cost ; environmental policy ; Federal government ; Global warming ; Government and politics ; Regulation ; state and federal government policy ; United States ; voluntary programs
  • É parte de: Regulation & governance, 2012-12, Vol.6 (4), p.445-473
  • Notas: ark:/67375/WNG-V9HZSXMQ-4
    ArticleID:REGO1140
    istex:04822167CA73B55F7FCD90B8930E49463A77F297
    ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: How does program sponsorship influence the design of voluntary programs? Why and how do voluntary programs on climate change sponsored by the state and federal governments in the United States vary in their institutional design? Scholars emphasize the signaling role of voluntary programs to outside stakeholders, and the excludable benefits that induce firms to take on non‐trivial costs of joining voluntary programs. Scholars have noted several types of benefits, particularly reputational benefits programs provide, but have not systematically studied why different programs emphasize different types of benefits. We suggest that excludable benefits are likely to take different forms depending on the institutional context in which program sponsors function. We hypothesize that federal programs are likely to emphasize less tangible reputational benefits while state programs are likely to emphasize more tangible benefits, such as access to technical knowledge and capital. Statistical analyses show the odds of a voluntary program emphasizing tangible benefits increases by several folds when the program is sponsored by the state as opposed to federal government.
  • Editor: Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia
  • Idioma: Inglês
Voltar para lista de resultados
Ir para página anteriorAnterior Resultado  3 AvançarIr para próxima página

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.