skip to main content
Guest
e-Shelf
My Account
Sign out
Sign in
This feature requires javascript
Tags
e-Journals
e-Books
Databases
USP Libraries
Help
Help
Language:
English
Spanish
Portuguese (Brazil)
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
General Search
General Search
Physical Collection
Physical Collections
USP Intelectual Production
USP Production
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
General Search
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
General Search
Advanced Search
Browse Search
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Responding to unauthorized residence: on a dilemma between ‘firewalls’ and ‘regularizations’
Schmid, Lukas
Comparative migration studies, 2024-12, Vol.12 (1), p.22-18, Article 22
[Peer Reviewed Journal]
Cham: Springer International Publishing
Full text available
Citations
Cited by
View Online
Details
Reviews & Tags
More
Times Cited
This feature requires javascript
Actions
Add to e-Shelf
Remove from e-Shelf
E-mail
Print
Permalink
Citation
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
Delicious
Export RIS
Export BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Title:
Responding to unauthorized residence: on a dilemma between ‘firewalls’ and ‘regularizations’
Author:
Schmid, Lukas
Subjects:
Firewalls
;
Immigrants
;
Immigration
;
Immigration control
;
Immigration policy
;
Inclusion
;
Migration
;
Moral dilemmas
;
Original Article
;
Policy making
;
Population Economics
;
Regularization
;
Residence
;
Rule of law
;
Social Sciences
;
Sociology
;
The Ethics of Migration Policy Dilemmas
;
Unauthorized
Is Part Of:
Comparative migration studies, 2024-12, Vol.12 (1), p.22-18, Article 22
Description:
Residence of unauthorized immigrants is a stable feature of the Global North’s liberal democracies. This article asks how liberal-democratic policymakers should respond to this phenomenon, assuming both that states have incontrovertible rights and interests to assert control over immigration and that unauthorized residence is nevertheless an entrenched fact. It argues that a set of liberal-democratic commitments gives policymakers strong reason to implement both so-called ‘firewall’ and ‘regularization’ policies, thereby protecting unauthorized immigrants’ basic needs and interests and officially incorporating many of them in society. It then explains that the background imperative of immigration control creates a dilemmatic tension between these policies, as regularization is envisaged alongside the removal of the ineligible, which is in turn hindered by the implementation of firewalls. This creates a dilemma between the pursuit of two policy goals that are both underwritten by the same value commitments. Though it cannot be entirely dissolved, I argue that the best way to mitigate this dilemma is to design regularization policy in a way that leaves only a small number of unauthorized immigrants subject to removal.
Publisher:
Cham: Springer International Publishing
Language:
English
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Back to results list
Result
1
Next
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait
Searching for
in
scope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Show me what you have so far
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript