Idioma:

Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review

Behm, David G ; Blazevich, Anthony J ; Kay, Anthony D ; McHugh, Malachy

Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism, 2016-01, Vol.41 (1), p.1-11 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Canada: NRC Research Press

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review
Autor: Behm, David G ; Blazevich, Anthony J ; Kay, Anthony D ; McHugh, Malachy
Assuntos: Athletic Performance - physiology ; ballistic stretch ; dynamic stretch ; Effects ; Exercise ; facilitation neuromusculaire proprioceptive ; flexibility ; flexibilité ; Human mechanics ; Human performance ; Humans ; Movement ; Muscle Stretching Exercises ; Muscle, Skeletal - injuries ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Observations ; Physiological aspects ; Physiological research ; proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Sports injuries ; static stretch ; Stretching exercises ; Systematic review ; warm-up ; échauffement ; étirement balistique ; étirement dynamique ; étirement statique
É parte de: Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism, 2016-01, Vol.41 (1), p.1-11
Notas: SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ObjectType-Article-3
Descrição: Recently, there has been a shift from static stretching (SS) or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching within a warm-up to a greater emphasis on dynamic stretching (DS). The objective of this review was to compare the effects of SS, DS, and PNF on performance, range of motion (ROM), and injury prevention. The data indicated that SS- (–3.7%), DS- (+1.3%), and PNF- (–4.4%) induced performance changes were small to moderate with testing performed immediately after stretching, possibly because of reduced muscle activation after SS and PNF. A dose–response relationship illustrated greater performance deficits with ≥60 s (–4.6%) than with <60 s (–1.1%) SS per muscle group. Conversely, SS demonstrated a moderate (2.2%) performance benefit at longer muscle lengths. Testing was performed on average 3–5 min after stretching, and most studies did not include poststretching dynamic activities; when these activities were included, no clear performance effect was observed. DS produced small-to-moderate performance improvements when completed within minutes of physical activity. SS and PNF stretching had no clear effect on all-cause or overuse injuries; no data are available for DS. All forms of training induced ROM improvements, typically lasting <30 min. Changes may result from acute reductions in muscle and tendon stiffness or from neural adaptations causing an improved stretch tolerance. Considering the small-to-moderate changes immediately after stretching and the study limitations, stretching within a warm-up that includes additional poststretching dynamic activity is recommended for reducing muscle injuries and increasing joint ROM with inconsequential effects on subsequent athletic performance.
Editor: Canada: NRC Research Press
Idioma: Inglês

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review

Behm, David G ; Blazevich, Anthony J ; Kay, Anthony D ; McHugh, Malachy

Canada: NRC Research Press

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.