skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
Search in:
Selecione a lista para navegar
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Por título
Por assunto
Por autor
Browse vid input
Busca Simples
This feature requires javascript
Quality Evaluation of Randomized Controlled Trials on Complementary and Alternative
Medicine
오가실 ; 김금순 ; 박지원 ; 강지연
Asian Nursing Research, 2007, 1(3), , pp.153-164
[Periódico revisado por pares]
한국간호과학회
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
Quality Evaluation of Randomized Controlled Trials on Complementary and Alternative
Medicine
Autor:
오가실
;
김금순
;
박지원
;
강지연
Assuntos:
간호학
É parte de:
Asian Nursing Research, 2007, 1(3), , pp.153-164
Notas:
G704-001995.2007.1.3.002
Descrição:
Purpose This study aims to describe the research characteristics and analyze the methodological quality of randomized clinical trials on complementary and alternative
medicine
(CAM). Methods A total of 76 studies using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CAM (16 by Koreans, 60 by internationals) published in the 6 years from 2000 to 2005 were reviewed systematically and analyzed with assessment criteria developed by the researchers on the basis of Jadad guidelines. Results Most of the studies were carried out in the area of
medicine
, nursing and CAM. More than 80% of the study subjects were patients. CAM modalities for independent variables were mainly on energy
medicine
, mind-body
medicine
and manipulative and body-based practices, while dependent variables were mostly physiological and psychological indexes. Most of the studies utilized randomization (93.4%) and identified the dropout rate (90.8%), whereas allocation concealment (49.3%) and double-blinding (18.9%) were specified in a small number of studies. The overall quality of RCTs based on the assessment criteria of this study was satisfactory. However, the quality score of the Korean studies (2.87) was lower than that of the international studies (3.37). Conclusion The methodological objectivity of CAM studies has been improving in spite of controversy over the scientific bases of CAM. More Korean studies with rigorous experimental design are needed to build up the evidence-based practice of CAM. KCI Citation Count: 1
Editor:
한국간호과학회
Idioma:
Coreano
Links
Access content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
Resultado
1
Avançar
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript