skip to main content

Ativismo Judicial e Direito à Saúde: a judicialização das políticas públicas de saúde e os impactos da postura ativista do Poder Judiciário

Nunes Pereira, Fernanda Tercetti

Revista brasileira de políticas públicas, 2015-06, Vol.5 (2) [Periódico revisado por pares]

Brasilia: Centro Universitario de Brasilia - UniCEUB

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Ativismo Judicial e Direito à Saúde: a judicialização das políticas públicas de saúde e os impactos da postura ativista do Poder Judiciário
  • Autor: Nunes Pereira, Fernanda Tercetti
  • Assuntos: Constitutions ; Health ; Judiciary ; Presidents ; Public policy ; Separation of powers
  • É parte de: Revista brasileira de políticas públicas, 2015-06, Vol.5 (2)
  • Descrição: The aim of this paper is to analyze the judicial activism related to the constitutional right to health together with the Executive Branchs constitutional competence to create public policies of health and to plan governmental actions. Each Political Entity in the Brazilian Federalism makes use of planning instruments, reckoned in the Federal Constitution, to elaborate their plan of governmental actions. One of these instruments is the Annual Budget Law, which forecasts every public incomes and expenses for a whole year in order to develop governmental actions planned. However, there is an increasing number of judicial decisions compelling the Executive Branch to grant medicines and medical treatments on individual lawsuits. This reality may threaten the governments budget since the Judiciary Branch imposes unforeseen expenses on the Executive Branchs planning. Therefore, it can be inferred that excessive judicial activism can lead to a negative impact on the execution of public policies of health and produce harmful effects on the principle of the separation of powers
  • Editor: Brasilia: Centro Universitario de Brasilia - UniCEUB
  • Idioma: Inglês;Português

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.