skip to main content
Idioma:
Tipo de recurso Mostra resultados com: Mostra resultados com: Índice

Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry

Morse, Janice M.

Qualitative health research, 2015-09, Vol.25 (9), p.1212-1222 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry
  • Autor: Morse, Janice M.
  • Assuntos: Bias ; Credibility ; Criteria ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Jargon ; Peer Review ; Qualitative Research ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Design ; Research Personnel ; Social sciences
  • É parte de: Qualitative health research, 2015-09, Vol.25 (9), p.1212-1222
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
    ObjectType-Article-2
    ObjectType-Feature-1
  • Descrição: Criteria for determining the trustworthiness of qualitative research were introduced by Guba and Lincoln in the 1980s when they replaced terminology for achieving rigor, reliability, validity, and generalizability with dependability, credibility, and transferability. Strategies for achieving trustworthiness were also introduced. This landmark contribution to qualitative research remains in use today, with only minor modifications in format. Despite the significance of this contribution over the past four decades, the strategies recommended to achieve trustworthiness have not been critically examined. Recommendations for where, why, and how to use these strategies have not been developed, and how well they achieve their intended goal has not been examined. We do not know, for example, what impact these strategies have on the completed research. In this article, I critique these strategies. I recommend that qualitative researchers return to the terminology of social sciences, using rigor, reliability, validity, and generalizability. I then make recommendations for the appropriate use of the strategies recommended to achieve rigor: prolonged engagement, persistent observation, and thick, rich description; inter-rater reliability, negative case analysis; peer review or debriefing; clarifying researcher bias; member checking; external audits; and triangulation.
  • Editor: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.