skip to main content
Idioma:
Tipo de recurso Mostra resultados com: Mostra resultados com: Índice

Comprehensive evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia: Prevention

Muscedere, John, MD ; Dodek, Peter, MD, MHSc ; Keenan, Sean, MD, MSc ; Fowler, Rob, MD, MDCM, MS ; Cook, Deborah, MD, MSc ; Heyland, Daren, MD, MSc

Journal of critical care, 2008-03, Vol.23 (1), p.126-137 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: Elsevier Inc

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Comprehensive evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia: Prevention
  • Autor: Muscedere, John, MD ; Dodek, Peter, MD, MHSc ; Keenan, Sean, MD, MSc ; Fowler, Rob, MD, MDCM, MS ; Cook, Deborah, MD, MSc ; Heyland, Daren, MD, MSc
  • Assuntos: Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Antibiotics ; Confidence intervals ; Critical Care ; Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Humidity ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Iodine ; Ostomy ; Patient positioning ; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated - prevention & control ; Posture ; Prevention ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Sinusitis ; Suction ; Suctioning ; Tracheostomy - methods ; Ventilator-associated pneumonia ; Ventilators
  • É parte de: Journal of critical care, 2008-03, Vol.23 (1), p.126-137
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Instructional Material/Guideline-2
    ObjectType-Feature-3
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: Abstract Background Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in ventilated critically ill patients. Purpose To develop evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of VAP. Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Register of Controlled Trials. Study Selection The authors systematically searched for all relevant randomized, controlled trials and systematic reviews on the topic of prevention of VAP in adults that were published from 1980 to October 1, 2006. Data Extraction Independently and in duplicate, the panel scored the internal validity of each trial. Effect size, confidence intervals, and homogeneity of the results were scored using predefined definitions. Scores for the safety, feasibility, and economic issues were assigned based on consensus of the guideline panel. Levels of Evidence The following statements were used: recommend, consider, do not recommend, and no recommendation due to insufficient or conflicting evidence. Data Synthesis To prevent VAP: We recommend: that the orotracheal route of intubation should be used for intubation; a new ventilator circuit for each patient; circuit changes if the circuit becomes soiled or damaged, but no scheduled changes; change of heat and moisture exchangers every 5 to 7 days or as clinically indicated; the use of a closed endotracheal suctioning system changed for each patient and as clinically indicated; subglottic secretion drainage in patients expected to be mechanically ventilated for more than 72 hours; head of bed elevation to 45° (when impossible, as near to 45° as possible should be considered). Consider: the use of rotating beds; oral antiseptic rinses. We do not recommend: use of bacterial filters; the use of iseganan We make no recommendations regarding: the use of a systematic search for sinusitis; type of airway humidification; timing of tracheostomy; prone positioning; aerosolized antibiotics; intranasal mupirocin; topical and/or intravenous antibiotics. Conclusion There are a growing number of evidence-based strategies for VAP prevention, which, if applied in practice, may reduce the incidence of this serious nosocomial infection.
  • Editor: United States: Elsevier Inc
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados
Ir para página anteriorAnterior Resultado  8 AvançarIr para próxima página

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.