skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
The notion of unitary psychosis: a conceptual history
Berrios, G.E. ; Beer, D.
History of psychiatry, 1994-03, Vol.5 (17), p.013-36
[Periódico revisado por pares]
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Sem texto completo
Citações
Citado por
Serviços
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
The notion of unitary psychosis: a conceptual history
Autor:
Berrios, G.E.
;
Beer, D.
Assuntos:
History of medicine
;
History, Modern 1601
;
Humans
;
Psychiatry
;
Psychoses
;
Psychotic Disorders - history
;
Terminology as Topic
É parte de:
History of psychiatry, 1994-03, Vol.5 (17), p.013-36
Notas:
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
Descrição:
'Unitary psychosis' is the collective name for a set of disparate doctrines whose common denominator is the view that there is only one form of psychosis and that its diverse clinical presentations can be explained in terms of endogenous and exogenous factors. This paper examines the history of these doctrines since the eighteenth century in the work of their main sponsors and extricates their conceptual assumptions. It is shown that the nature of the debate between 'unitarians' and those who believed in the existence of separate diseases has changed throughout time, and that to these changes national differences have been important. Earlier discussions made use of conceptual and ontological argument; latter ones of clinical analysis; and the latest debate, that occurred during the 1970s, over-relied on statistical techniques and genetic analysis. The outcome of this long debate remains inconclusive.
Editor:
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Idioma:
Inglês
Links
View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP_FISICO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript