skip to main content
Idioma:

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preserving residual kidney function in peritoneal dialysis patients

Zhang, Ling ; Zeng, Xiaoxi ; Fu, Ping ; Wu, Hong Mei ; Zhang, Ling

Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014-06, Vol.2014 (11), p.CD009120-CD009120 [Revista revisada por pares]

Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Texto completo disponible

Citas Citado por
  • Título:
    Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preserving residual kidney function in peritoneal dialysis patients
  • Autor: Zhang, Ling ; Zeng, Xiaoxi ; Fu, Ping ; Wu, Hong Mei ; Zhang, Ling
  • Materias: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists ; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Angiotensin‐Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; Antihypertensive Agents ; Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use ; Disease Progression ; END‐STAGE KIDNEY DISEASE ; Humans ; Kidney ; Kidney - drug effects ; Kidney - physiopathology ; Kidney disease ; Kidney Failure, Chronic ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences ; Other ; Peritoneal Dialysis ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Es parte de: Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014-06, Vol.2014 (11), p.CD009120-CD009120
  • Notas: new_version
    ObjectType-Article-2
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-1
    ObjectType-Review-4
    content type line 23
    ObjectType-Undefined-3
  • Descripción: Background Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, yet controversy exists about their impact on residual kidney function. Objectives This review aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of ACEis and ARBs for preserving residual kidney function in PD patients. Search methods The Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE (OvidSP interface), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and other resources were searched by applying a prespecified comprehensive search strategy. Date of last search: 01 May 2014. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi‐RCTs comparing ACEis or ARBs with placebo, other antihypertensive drugs or each other in PD patients were included. Data collection and analysis Screening, selection, data extraction and quality assessments for each retrieved article were carried out by two authors using standardised forms. Authors were contacted when published data were incomplete. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity among studies was explored using the Cochran Q statistic and the I² test, subgroup analyses and random effects meta‐regression. Main results Six open‐label studies (257 patients) were identified. One study compared ACEi with other antihypertensive drugs, three compared ARBs with other antihypertensive drugs, and two studies compared an ARB with an ACEi. Long‐term use (≥ 12 months) of an ARB showed significantly benefit of preserving residual kidney function in continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) patients (MD 1.11 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI 0.38 to 1.83), although there was no significant benefit when an ARB were used short‐term (≤ six months). One study showed that compared with other antihypertensive drugs, long‐term use (12 months) of the ACEi ramipril showed a significant reduction in the decline of residual kidney function in patients on CAPD (MD ‐0.93 mL/min/1.73m², 95% CI ‐0.75 to ‐0.11), and delayed the progression to complete anuria (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.99). There was no significant difference in serum potassium, urinary protein excretion, Kt/V, weekly creatinine clearance and blood pressure for ARBs versus other antihypertensive drugs. Compared with other antihypertensive drugs, ramipril showed no difference in mortality and cardiovascular events. Compared with an ACEi, ARBs did not show any difference in residual kidney function. The selection bias assessment was low in four studies and unclear in two. Five studies were open‐label; however the primary outcome (residual kidney function) was obtained objectively from laboratory tests, and were not likely to be influenced by the lack of blinding. Reporting bias was unclear in all six studies. Authors' conclusions Compared with other antihypertensive drugs, long‐term use (≥ 12 months) of ACEis or ARBs showed additional benefits of preserving residual kidney function in CAPD patients. There was no significant difference on residual kidney function preservation between ARBs and ACEis. However, limited by the small number of RCTs enrolling small number of participants, there is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of an ACEi or an ARB as first line antihypertensive therapy in PD patients.
  • Editor: Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  • Idioma: Inglés
Enlaces
Volver a la lista de resultados
Ir a la página anteriorAnterior Resultado  8 SiguienteIr a la siguiente página

  • Realización: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociales: Freepik

Buscando en bases de datos remotas, por favor espere

  • Buscando por
  • enscope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
  • Mostrar lo que tiene hasta ahora