skip to main content
Idioma:

The past, present: The Parthenon Sculptures dispute as an example of the ICPRCP’s role on claims barred by the non-retroactivity of the 1970 UNESCO Convention

Machado Haertel, Letícia

International journal of cultural property, 2021-11, Vol.28 (4), p.479-504 [Periódico revisado por pares]

New York, USA: Cambridge University Press

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    The past, present: The Parthenon Sculptures dispute as an example of the ICPRCP’s role on claims barred by the non-retroactivity of the 1970 UNESCO Convention
  • Autor: Machado Haertel, Letícia
  • Assuntos: 20th century ; Committees ; Conventions ; Cultural heritage ; Cultural property ; Dispute resolution (Law) ; Disputes ; Historic artifacts ; History ; International cooperation ; Mediation ; Museums ; Restitution ; Sculpture ; Unesco
  • É parte de: International journal of cultural property, 2021-11, Vol.28 (4), p.479-504
  • Notas: International Journal of Cultural Property, Vol. 28, No. 4, Dec 2021, 479-504
    Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
  • Descrição: This article analyzes the role played by the Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to Its Countries of Origin or Its Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation (ICPRCP) in promoting the settlement of disputes barred by the non-retroactivity of the 1970 UNESCO Convention through an assessment of its impact on the dispute between Greece and the United Kingdom over the Parthenon Sculptures. The analysis first focuses on the ICPRCP’s regular mandate, followed by an evaluation of some “collateral effects” that it might have had on the dispute. Through the examination of all reports, recommendations, and decisions issued by the ICPRCP and the performance of a wider interdisciplinary case study, it is argued that the ICPRCP has had an impact on the dispute, both directly and indirectly. The value of these conclusions is to shed light on the complex factors in interplay in voluntary and non-binding dispute settlement mechanisms such as the ones performed by the ICPRCP and to represent a framework for further studies on the ICPRCP’s work and alternative dispute resolution methods in general.
  • Editor: New York, USA: Cambridge University Press
  • Idioma: Inglês
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.