skip to main content
Guest
e-Shelf
My Account
Sign out
Sign in
This feature requires javascript
Tags
e-Journals
e-Books
Databases
USP Libraries
Help
Help
Language:
English
Spanish
Portuguese (Brazil)
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
General Search
General Search
Physical Collection
Physical Collections
USP Intelectual Production
USP Production
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
General Search
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
General Search
Advanced Search
Browse Search
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
YOU CAN USE MY NAME; YOU DON'T HAVE TO STEAL MY STORY - A CRITIQUE OF ANONYMITY IN INDIGENOUS STUDIES
SVALASTOG, ANNA-LYDIA ; ERIKSSON, STEFAN
Developing world bioethics, 2010-08, Vol.10 (2), p.104-110
[Peer Reviewed Journal]
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Full text available
Citations
Cited by
View Online
Details
Reviews & Tags
More
Times Cited
This feature requires javascript
Actions
Add to e-Shelf
Remove from e-Shelf
E-mail
Print
Permalink
Citation
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
Delicious
Export RIS
Export BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Title:
YOU CAN USE MY NAME; YOU DON'T HAVE TO STEAL MY STORY - A CRITIQUE OF ANONYMITY IN INDIGENOUS STUDIES
Author:
SVALASTOG, ANNA-LYDIA
;
ERIKSSON, STEFAN
Subjects:
Anonymity
;
Anonyms and Pseudonyms
;
benefit sharing
;
Bioethics
;
Community participation
;
Community-Based Participatory Research -
ethics
;
Confidentiality
;
Confidentiality -
ethics
;
Ethics
;
Ethics
, Research
;
Etik
;
HUMANIORA och RELIGIONSVETENSKAP
;
HUMANITIES and RELIGION
;
Humans
;
Identification
;
Indigenous rights
;
indigenous studies
;
Informed Consent -
ethics
;
Ownership
-
ethics
;
Population Groups
;
Property rights
;
Religion/Theology
;
Religionsvetenskap/Teologi
;
research
ethics
;
Research methods
;
Research projects
;
Research Subjects
;
Researcher-Subject Relations -
ethics
;
traditional knowledge
Is Part Of:
Developing world bioethics, 2010-08, Vol.10 (2), p.104-110
Notes:
ark:/67375/WNG-8Z9M4HVP-F
istex:D4ACA7855B908B50F63AEB55C03048CF1E89DC1D
ArticleID:DEWB276
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
Description:
ABSTRACT Our claim in this paper is that not being identified as the data source might cause harm to a person or group. Therefore, in some cases the default of anonymisation should be replaced by a careful deliberation, together with research subjects, of how to handle the issues of identification and confidentiality. Our prime example in this article is community participatory research and similar endeavours on indigenous groups. The theme, content and aim of the research, and the question of how to handle property rights and ownership of research results, as well as who should be in charge of the research process, including the process of creating anonymity, should all be answered, before anonymity is accepted.
Publisher:
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Language:
English
Links
View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
View record from Swedish Publication Index
View record from Swedish Publication Index
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Back to results list
Previous
Result
2
Next
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait
Searching for
in
scope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Show me what you have so far
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript