Idioma:

Can Posterior Pericardial Incision Truly Improve Postoperative Complications After Cardiac Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Shen, Zhe-An ; Hou, Yingze ; Yu, Limei ; Wang, Xiaofang ; Dong, Aiqiang ; Kong, Minjian ; Shi, Heng

Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular, 2023-01, Vol.38 (5), p.e20220350-e20220350

Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Can Posterior Pericardial Incision Truly Improve Postoperative Complications After Cardiac Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Autor: Shen, Zhe-An ; Hou, Yingze ; Yu, Limei ; Wang, Xiaofang ; Dong, Aiqiang ; Kong, Minjian ; Shi, Heng
Assuntos: Atrial Fibrillation ; Atrial Fibrillation - etiology ; Atrial Fibrillation - prevention & control ; Bias ; CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiac Surgery ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical trials ; Confidence intervals ; Coronary vessels ; Heart failure ; Heart surgery ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Length of stay ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Pericardial Effusion - etiology ; Pericardial Effusion - prevention & control ; Pericardiotomy ; Postoperative Care ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Postoperative period ; Review ; Risk Factors ; SURGERY ; Surgical Wound ; Systematic review ; Treatment Outcome ; Veins & arteries
É parte de: Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular, 2023-01, Vol.38 (5), p.e20220350-e20220350
Notas: SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Undefined-4
Descrição: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and pericardial effusion are important factors affecting prognosis after cardiac surgery. Recently, it has been reported that posterior pericardiotomy (PP) can effectively prevent the occurrence of POAF and pericardial effusion. To validate these conclusions and guide clinical practice, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched multiple databases for manuscripts published before July 2022 on the use of PP to prevent POAF and pericardial effusion and included only randomized controlled trials. The main outcome was atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting, and secondary outcomes were included. This meta-analysis included 14 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2275 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of POAF after cardiac surgery in the PP group was significantly lower than that in the control group (risk ratio=0.48; 95% confidence interval=0.33~0.69; P<0.00001). PP effectively reduced postoperative pericardial effusion (risk ratio=0.34, 95% confidence interval=0.21-0.55; P<0.00001). PP has shown good results in preventing POAF, pericardial effusion, and other complications, which indicates that PP is a safe and effective surgical method, but attention still needs to be paid to the potential risk of coagulation dysfunction caused by PP.
Editor: Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
Idioma: Inglês;Português

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Anterior Resultado 8 Avançar Ir para próxima página

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Can Posterior Pericardial Incision Truly Improve Postoperative Complications After Cardiac Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Shen, Zhe-An ; Hou, Yingze ; Yu, Limei ; Wang, Xiaofang ; Dong, Aiqiang ; Kong, Minjian ; Shi, Heng

Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.